About Me

My photo
Alpha is a graduate of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law and serves as President of the UTHRT Organization, which advocates for individual rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and upholds the values of freedom of speech.

Thursday, January 1, 2026

UTHRT: HAPPY NEW YEAR 2026!

 Dear Friends,

Happy New Year 2026!

A year has passed, and another year is here.
2025 was a remarkable year for me. I learned a great deal, traveled extensively, and experienced meaningful personal growth.

This year, I learned an invaluable lesson about life: life is like a river — in constant change, flowing through different landscapes and sceneries, with ups and downs, day after day, season after season, year after year.
Yet, as an individual, I choose to embrace the belief that whatever happens, happens for a reason — and that reason is always for my good.

As a result, I would advise my friends to be like water — move through the different stages of life, give your best performance, and expect nothing in return.
Fight your small fights without complaints, because in the end everything will be alright. And if it is not alright, then it is not the end yet.

This year, my travels took me through various neighborhoods of the city of Chicago and across the country. I dedicated significant time to visiting museums, supporting local musicians, enjoying local restaurants, and exploring state and national parks. I came to the conclusion that you can travel every day in your own city.
All you need to do is see every person you meet as a potential friend, every neighborhood as a potential home, and witness every day with your heart.
Trust me — you will not need to take a plane. You will travel every day as you awaken like a child, choosing to discover, to learn, and to be yourself.

In 2026, I will continue to be a bird building my little nest, seeking truth and beauty in the world and sharing them with others. This journey is deeply fulfilled through my work with Under the Human Rights Tree (UTHRT Organization).
The UTHRT Organization, a nonprofit initiative, remains active, and I warmly invite you to visit 
www.uthrt.org and, if you can, make a donation to support our ongoing efforts.

I also welcome the new year standing for freedom of speech, listening to countless voices around the world resonate — each deserving to be heard. I believe in the power of listening, and I invite you to subscribe to the Under the Human Rights Tree YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/@alpha-uthrt.
I will also continue traveling, observing, and documenting my experiences, which you can follow on my blog at 
www.underthehumanrightstree.org.

Furthermore, as life pours its torrent of “misfortunes” upon us, join us in 2026 to sing and danceto celebrate life through music with Alpha and the Princes of Futa.
I believe music — through singing and dancing — is a medicine to overcome the challenges of life, if we can even call them that.
You can follow us on Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/alpha_and_the_princes_of_futa/
or on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/princesoffuta/
or simply share the best email to reach you— I will make sure you stay updated.

As 2025 fades into memory, I hope it brought you valuable lessons. As we step into 2026, I encourage you to be a little bird: every morning, give birth to ideas and take action to build them into reality. Whatever the outcome, learn to accept it — because it is yours.

Once again, I extend my heartfelt wishes to you and your loved ones for a Happy New Year 2026!

Best Regards,
Alpha

 

 


Wednesday, December 17, 2025

UTHRT: A JOURNEY OF REFLECTIONS ON GENOCIDE AND EDUCATION


    On Sunday, March 11, 2011, I remember it was a cold day in Chicago. I attended the annual benefit, Everyone Has a Voice, at the Illinois Holocaust Museum and Education Center, located at 9603 Woods Drive in Skokie, Illinois. The trip itself became an educational journey. I boarded the Red Line at Granville and rode north to Howard Station, the last stop before the Chicago–Evanston border. From there, I transferred to the Yellow Line toward Skokie.

         Skokie, located in Cook County about fifteen miles north of downtown Chicago, takes its name from a Potawatomi word meaning marsh. Once a small farming community founded by German and Luxembourg settlers, it later became home to a large Jewish population—many of them Holocaust survivors who settled there after World War II. By the mid-1960s, Skokie had one of the highest concentrations of Jewish residents in the United States.

         In the 1970s, Skokie became a national symbol in the debate over the First Amendment when a Neo-Nazi group, supported by the ACLU, sought permission to march there—despite the presence of many Holocaust survivors. The case, National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie, reached the U.S. Supreme Court and remains a landmark in discussions of free speech and hate speech.

         Today, Skokie is home to the Illinois Holocaust Museum and Education Center, which opened in 2009. Its guiding vision—Remember the Past; Transform the Future—calls on us to preserve memory, honor victims, and use history to fight prejudice and indifference.

         The museum grew out of the Holocaust Memorial Foundation of Illinois, founded in 1981 after residents united against the attempted Nazi march. The building, designed by architect Stanley Tigerman with exhibits by Yitzchak Mais, contrasts light and darkness through its black-and-white exterior. Every hallway and exhibit reminds visitors of the human capacity for both cruelty and courage.

         The fall of 2025 in Chicago has been unusually kind. The air still carries a touch of summer, making walking, running, biking, or simply being outdoors pleasant. Yet as one moves through the city—or scrolls through social media—it is impossible to escape the noise of our time: protests, posts, and reels streaming across X, Instagram, Facebook, Truth Social, podcasts, and TikTok. Under the banner of free speech, images of conflict and suffering appear constantly—sometimes real, sometimes manipulated—depending on perspective.

         One word echoes everywhere, from newsrooms to online debates: genocide. Across platforms, people argue over its meaning, often shaping definitions to fit loyalties. But in law, emotion and sentiment do not define truth; only facts, evidence, and legal standards do.

         This is why I chose to revisit the concept of genocide—not to take sides, but to learn, reflect, and share for educational purposes. I believe education never truly ends. Life itself becomes the classroom, and experience the teacher.

         The word genocide was introduced by Raphael Lemkin, a Polish-Jewish jurist, during World War II. He combined the Greek genos (“race” or “people”) with the Latin -cide (“to kill”) to describe the deliberate destruction of a group. Lemkin argued that genocide was not limited to mass murder; it also included cultural, social, and economic destruction aimed at erasing a people’s existence.

         His advocacy led to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 9, 1948. It entered into force in January 1951 and defines genocide as acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. These acts include killing members of the group, causing serious harm, imposing destructive living conditions, preventing births, or forcibly transferring children to another group.

         Legally, genocide requires specific intent—the conscious goal to destroy a protected group. Courts differ on how that intent is interpreted: some require proof of deliberate purpose, while others accept awareness that one’s actions would lead to destruction.

         Although the Convention does not apply retroactively to events before 1951, it established genocide as a crime under international law. Its principles later formed part of the statutes of international criminal tribunals and the International Criminal Court (ICC).

         A common misconception is that genocide always means large-scale killing. In truth, destruction can also take nonviolent forms—such as erasing language, religion, or culture; forced relocation; or the suppression of identity. Lemkin identified eight methods of genocide: political, social, cultural, economic, biological, physical, religious, and moral. These show that extermination can occur without a single bullet being fired.

         On Wednesday, October 29, 2025, it was a pleasant day. I took the Red Line at the Thorndale station around 1:30 p.m., exited at Grand Avenue, and walked a short distance, arriving at 2:20 p.m. at the Illinois Holocaust Museum and Education Center. Mr. Cole kindly provided an overview of the museum’s exhibitions. At 2:45 p.m., I experienced a VR presentation, and at 3:35 p.m., I participated in a holographic program featuring survivors’ stories. Later, I explored exhibits displaying documentaries, artifacts, letters, and testimonies from genocide survivors.

         As Elie Wiesel said, “Whoever listens to a witness becomes a witness.”

         At 4:50 p.m., I left the museum. The visit reawakened memories of my academic studies in international law and human rights. I was reminded that every December 9, the world observes the International Day of Commemoration and Dignity of the Victims of the Crime of Genocide—a day to remember, to prevent repetition, and to reaffirm our shared humanity.

         If there is a way to stop history from repeating itself, it begins with education—by learning, teaching, and telling the truth. Our children should grow up knowing there is only one race: the human race. The truest faith is love. Though our beginnings and endings are the same, what truly matters is how we treat one another in between. Let it be remembered: no one should ever choose to kill, displace, or erase others because of race, religion, culture, nationality, or ethnicity.

         As for the Illinois Holocaust Museum and Education Center, it is currently closed at its Skokie location (9603 Woods Drive) and has temporarily relocated to 360 N. State Street (at Kinzie) in downtown Chicago. If you are seeking a well of knowledge and understanding, I encourage you to visit and experience its enlightening exhibitions.

By Alpha Diallo



Tuesday, September 16, 2025

UTHRT: A JOURNEY TO THE MAMMOTH CAVE NATIONAL PARK

 UTHRT: A Journey to the Mammoth Cave National Park

The state of Kentucky is located in the south-central United States, bordered by the Ohio River to the north, the Mississippi River to the west, and seven states: Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, West Virginia, Virginia, Tennessee, and Missouri. It is part of the Appalachian region, known as the Bluegrass State, and is popular for the Kentucky Derby.

The distance from Chicago to Mammoth Cave National Park in Kentucky is about 390 miles and can take around six hours, depending on traffic, road construction, or whether you stop at one of the many rest areas along the highways.

On Monday, August 28, I left Chicago heading south on Interstate 65. Along the way, I passed through Indianapolis. In the midst of traffic, I noticed a motorcyclist in a black helmet carrying his firearm, exercising his Second Amendment right to bear arms. I continued on through Louisville, crossed the bridge over the Ohio River, and eventually arrived in a small town called Cave City. From there, I turned right and headed toward Mammoth Cave National Park.

Mammoth Cave National Park, located in south-central Kentucky, is the longest known cave system in the world. The park covers 52,007 acres (21,046 ha), primarily in Edmonson County. The Green River runs through the park, with its tributary, the Nolin River, feeding into it just inside the park.

Since 1972, the cave system has been formally known as the Mammoth–Flint Ridge Cave System. As of 2025, more than 426 miles (686 km) of passageways have been surveyed. The park was established on July 1, 1941, after years of contentious eminent domain proceedings whose effects still linger in the region. It became a World Heritage Site in 1981, an International Biosphere Reserve in 1990, and an International Dark Sky Park in 2021.

The park’s mission is to:

“Preserve, protect, interpret, and study the internationally recognized biological and geologic features and processes associated with the longest known cave system in the world, the park’s diverse forested karst landscape, the Green and Nolin rivers, and extensive evidence of human history; and to provide and promote public enjoyment, recreation, and understanding.”

I arrived late in the evening, set up my tent, ate a simple meal, and went to bed after a long day on the road. Nature began playing its symphony of unfamiliar sounds. The sky was clear, the stars shone brightly, and tall green trees surrounded me. Under that peaceful atmosphere, I slept without fear.

The next morning, I woke up around 9:30 a.m. I walked to the showers, where I paid $1.50 for a four-minute shower, with extra time costing additional coins. After breakfast, I headed to the Visitor Center.

At the Visitor Center, I explored a small museum that previewed what visitors could expect: the history of Mammoth Cave, maps of the cave system, hiking trails, and the park’s rich ecology. Documentaries, articles, and videos added depth to the experience. I bought two tour tickets—the Grand Avenue Tour and the Historic Tour. Later, I went on a short hike to the Green River before heading into Cave City to buy groceries for the rest of my stay.

My first tour, the Grand Avenue Tour, required a short bus ride from the Visitor Center to the cave entrance. It covered four miles underground with 1,521 stairs (plus an optional 96). The path was strenuous and lasted about four hours. The tour showcased the park’s geologic diversity: slot canyons, tubular passageways, towering canyons, and tunnels sparkling with gypsum. With its many steep climbs and descents, the tour offered both physical challenge and fascinating lessons in geology and history.

The next day, I took the Historic Tour, a two-hour, two-mile walk with 540 stairs, including 155 in Mammoth Dome. This tour explored tunnels humans have used for thousands of years. It included both vast chambers that gave Mammoth Cave its name and narrow passages deep inside the cave. It was ideal for those interested in both adventure and history.

My journey to Mammoth Cave was guided by my interest in the environment, preservation, and my desire to support U.S. national parks. Yet, I left with more than just knowledge of geology and ecology—I also gained insight into another face of what is often called “Red State” America.

On my first tour, our female guide honored the legacy of Stephen Bishop, a famous enslaved guide at Mammoth Cave. His detailed, hand-drawn maps of the cave system became vital references for generations. On my second day, our group’s guides reflected America’s diversity—one was going through gender transition, and another was of Asian descent—showing inclusion across gender, sexual orientation, and race.

After five days of camping, I packed up my tent, made sure the site was clean, and began my journey back to Chicago.

The journey of life continues. As one guide reminded us, there are 63 designated national parks in the United States, protected by Congress and the National Park Service. This does not include the 400-plus other NPS-managed sites—national monuments, seashores, and historic landmarks.

National parks across the country are waiting to be explored. I may not have the time or resources to see them all, but I will try. If you have the chance, I encourage you to visit them too. There is so much to learn about this country that cannot be discovered by simply sitting in front of a TV. I hope to meet some of you in one of these parks.

As you travel, if you encounter an area you believe deserves protection, speak up. While creating a national park requires an act of Congress, presidents can also designate federal land as national monuments, which may later become national parks. The National Park Service plays a vital role by studying these lands and making recommendations—ensuring future generations can enjoy the same treasures we do today.

Best regards,

Alpha 



Wednesday, January 1, 2025

UTHRT: HAPPY NEW YEAR 2025!

Dear Friends,

Happy New Year 2025!

         A year has passed, and another year is upon us. 2024 was a remarkable year for me. I learned a great deal, traveled extensively, and experienced personal growth.

         In the country where I have lived for years, there is a new President preparing to take office, while the outgoing President steps down without resistance or clinging to power. This transition makes me proud to be American and to live in a nation where democracy prevails. I am grateful to the founding fathers of this country, who, surrounded by monarchies, chose democracy—a system that allows the people to select their leaders. I also admire George Washington, who set a powerful example by relinquishing power willingly, cementing the principles of alternation in leadership, democracy, and the sovereignty of the people. As I see it, whether the people's choice is deemed good or bad, it is their choice, and that is what truly matters.

         This year, I learned an invaluable lesson about life: it’s not about remaining unscathed like a flawless crystal, but about embracing the cracks and using time and effort to mend them with golden powder. This philosophy resonates with the Japanese art of "Kintsugi," which translates to "golden joinery." Kintsugi involves repairing broken pottery with lacquer mixed with gold, emphasizing rather than concealing the cracks. It celebrates imperfections and the history of the object through its breaks and repairs. In light of this, I encourage you to embrace your authentic self—flaws and all—and celebrate your unique journey.

         This year, my travels took me to various cities across the country. I dedicated significant time to aimless strolls through these cities and their parks, immersing myself in both nature and human connections. Along the way, I captured the beauty of the world and shared it with my friends.

         In 2024, I continued my journey of seeking truth and beauty in the world and sharing it with others. This endeavor has been deeply fulfilling, particularly through my work under the Human Rights Tree (UTHRT). The UTHRT Organization, a non-profit initiative, remains active, and I urge you to consider visiting www.uthrt.org and making a donation to support our ongoing efforts.

         As a new year unfolds, countless voices around the world resonate, each deserving to be heard. I believe in the power of listening and invite you to subscribe to the Under the Human Rights Tree YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/@alpha-uthrt. I also plan to embark on new travels, observing and documenting my experiences, which you can follow on my blog at www.underthehumanrightstree.org.

         As 2024 fades into memory, I hope it brought you valuable lessons. As we step into 2025, it is like a blank page, waiting for your story. Whatever story you decide to write, I urge you to believe in yourself. Go for it, and you will succeed. Remember, success is not solely about the outcome but the journey itself.

         Once again, I extend my heartfelt wishes to you and your loved ones for a Happy New Year in 2025!

Best Regards,

Alpha

 


 

 

Monday, January 1, 2024

UTHRT; HAPPY NEW YEAR 2024!

 Dear Friends, 

Happy New Year 2024!

A year is gone; another year is here. 2023 has been a great year. I learned a great deal, traveled, and grew.

In the city where I lived for years, I witnessed city leaders closing schools due to financial constraints. This decision left children roaming the streets with nothing to do. Additionally, they opened the doors of prisons wide, seemingly prioritizing profit over the well-being of the community. 

Also, I witnessed the closure of publicly funded hospitals and mental institutions. Further, these same leaders not only defunded but also shut down homeless shelters for their constituents and veterans. Consequently, many individuals found themselves in shantytowns beneath the bridges of our cities.

 However, this year, they proudly called our city a sanctuary city, welcoming people from around the world. Astonishingly, they managed to find the money to offer kickbacks to their donors on lucrative contract to renovate schools they previously closed, rent hotels owned by those very donors and provide free schools and healthcare- services they had denied to their own families and children. 

Therefore, I have learned not trust a father who goes around taking care of the families of the world, only to neglect his own. As the French saying goes “La charité bien ordonnée commence par soi-même,”, which translates to “Charity begins at home.”

Moreover, this year, the Supreme Court justices chose not to emulate their children’s student debts, despite the pandemic. They reached the conclusion that the “Too big to fail” doctrine does not apply to them. Once, again, I have come to understand that blaming them is futile, as no one will fight for your rights for you. Instead wasting time on victimhood, focus on forging a direct path. Strive to attain a position of power that enables you to shape society according to your values, including the fundamental right to education.  

Finally, this year, I learned that life is akin to laws, and laws must mirror the reality of their time and society. Each law has its principles and exceptions. While our desire is to live in accordance with the principle of our laws, it remains a wish. At times, addressing real problems requires a sincere consideration of utilizing the exceptions within our laws. 

This year, my travels let me in various cities across the country. I dedicated a significant portion of my time to aimless strolls through each city and its parks, engaging with both people and nature. Also, I revisited Guinea to reconnect with my family, immersing myself in the daily lives of the Guinean people. As I observed them in the streets, markets, offices and other places. I discovered why many of them do not succumb to depression. 

My findings led me to believe that they may not have the luxury to let their minds wander aimlessly. Instead, they rise up each day, driven by the imperative to make living or die.

Furthermore, I found Guinea under a military regime, where leader who had promised  to organize free, fair and democratic election following his coup d’état, went to the United Nations Assembly. In a surprising turn, he spoke out against democratic values, criticizing Western countries for imposing them on us. Perhaps, he forgot that democratic values are universal. The current narrative in Guinea can be aptly titled “Let’s wait and See” as the Guinean people are compelled to watch the unfolding events.

In 2023, I experienced personal growth through my continued journey to seek the truths and beauties of our world, sharing them Under the Human Rights Tree. Throughout this process, the UTHRT Organization, a non-profit, remains active and I urge you to consider visiting www.uthrt.org and making a donation to support my ongoing work. 

As a new year unfolds, countless voices resonate, each deserving to be heard. I believe in the importance of listening, and I invite you to subscribe and join me Under the Human Rights Tree YouTube channel: www.youtube.com/@alpha-uthrt. Also, I will be embarking on travels, keeping my eyes open to observe and document, and you can follow my blog journey at www.underthehumanrightstree.org 

The year 2023 has passed, and I trust it brought valuable lessons. As we step in 2024 with its unique blend of joyous moments and challenges, I encourage you to embrace gratitude for the happy times and face challenges with courage, devoid of bitterness. Once more, I extend my heartfelt wishes for a Happy New Year to you and your loved ones in 2024!

 

Best Regards

Alpha

 


 

Sunday, September 3, 2023

UTHRT: THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN AMERICA PART III FINAL.

Part III: Solutions to the Healthcare Crisis in America

In the United States of America, individuals do not have an inherent right to healthcare. Instead, the country operates within a health insurance system. According to studies conducted by Families USA, a non-profit organization specializing in health-related statistics estimation, over 26,260 Americans aged 25 to 64 lost their lives in 2006 due to the lack of health insurance coverage. Furthermore, as of 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that approximately 28,1 million individuals (8.6% of the population), spanning all ages groups, lacked insurance in the U.S., which includes 3 million children. This absence of health insurance is correlated with an estimated 44, 789 excess deaths annually across the nation.

In the State of Illinois, approximately 8.7%  of adults aged 18-64 lack insurance coverage. According to the Illinois Health Agents Report, around 5,000 residents of Illinois lost their lives between 2005 and 2010 due to a lack of insurance.

These American lacking of health insurance can often be seen in our neighborhoods. They voice their concerns about health issues, yet, they refrain from seeking medical help or engaging in preventive medicine due to their lack of health insurance and inability to afford it. You may also encounter them on buses and trains, displaying untreated and festering wounds, with smiles lacking teeth, and struggling with mental illness. Furthermore, they can be found in library, on the street corners and at store entrances. They are an integral part of our social fabric, unless one decides they no longer wish to acknowledge their existence. 

The issue of health in America is of utmost importance and warrants careful analysis and viable solutions. In my opinion, the key to addressing this challenge lies in whether citizens can find ways to transform the health insurance system into a comprehensive healthcare system or allow both approaches to coexist, fostering healthy competition and giving people the freedom to choose. Personally, I advocate for adopting the principles of capitalism based on competition, which would enable both systems to coexist harmoniously.

Based on my personal experience dealing with government agencies in this country, I am not fond of having them handle all matters of our health. Therefore, I believe it would be better to have both systems in place and provide individuals with the option to choose the system that best suits their financial means. 

So, as the Fulani proverb goes, "When a needle falls into a deep well, many people will look into the well, but few will be ready to go down after it." Therefore, in this final chapter on the Right to Health in America, I will not simply dwell on complaints and demands. I will delve into the health insurance problem and provide solutions to address this issue. However, I am aware that my theoretical and rhetorical solutions alone will not be sufficient to change the system. It will require tremendous willpower and effort from the citizens of this country to adapt the healthcare system that works for everyone. 

Furthermore, as we examine the health landscape in this country, we must acknowledge that health insurance and pharmaceutical companies wield substantial power and have a significant financial stake in this matter, making them reluctant to relinquish it without a fight. Additionally, many American citizens rely on the job benefits provided by these companies for their livelihoods and quality of life. In life, I have learned that people often prioritize their own interests. However, I firmly believe that the individual’s right to health outweighs the interests of insurance and pharmaceutical companies. Therefore, if change is to occur, it becomes the responsibility of each individual, family, community, state, and federal government to contribute to the solution. This task demands more than mere slogans; it necessitates an ongoing battle that each person must undertake.

So, what are the solutions I propose?

At the individual level

I strongly believe that it is the responsibility of  U.S. government to ensure that every American citizen has access to optional insurance or healthcare systems when they fall ill, without the fear of losing their home and belongings. However, I also believe that individuals have a personal obligation to take care themselves by making conscious choices about the foods they consume, engaging in regular physical and mental exercise, and adopting a healthy lifestyle. 

Moreover, I firmly believe that healthy individuals who pay taxes should assert their right to healthcare by advocating, organizing, protesting, and voting, especially if the government fails to provide adequate protection. It is crucial for citizens to actively demand their government to prioritize healthcare as a fundamental right. 

While we assert our right to healthcare and hope for the day when our government fulfills this obligation, we must learn to take matters into our own hands by seeking solutions at the individual level. These solutions will only benefit us but also help the government save expenses for future generations. 

One of the first steps individuals can take is to prioritize eating healthy food, recognizing that food acts as the body’s first form medicine. As Karen Salmansohn wisely said, “Eating healthy food fills your body with energy and nutrients.”

In cases where affording healthy meals presents a challenge, one should consider cultivating a small garden or joining a community garden. Through my own experience with a “brown garden project,” I was able to demonstrate its feasibility grow healthy food even on a limited budget and plot of land. However, the emphasizes should always be guided by the principle of self-reliance. In an article titled “How Does Food Impact Health” published by Earl E Bakken Center for Spirituality and Healing at the University of Minnesota, Carolyn Benton LN suggest that “Food acts as medicine-to maintain, prevent, and treat disease.” The same article highlights that the United States ranks ninth in life expectancy among developed nations, largely due to significant health problems cause by our dietary choices. Increasingly, researchers believe that diseases such as type II diabetes, obesity, heart disease, stroke, and certain cancers are linked to the food we consume. 

Therefore, a crucial solution for individual to adopt when addressing health concerns in this country is to prioritize consuming a healthy diet.

Another crucial step individuals can take is to engage in regular exercise. Just as we eat every day to survive, regular exercise is necessary to maintain good health. Exercise can include physical activities such as walking, running, dancing and other forms of physical exercise. Edward Stanley once stated, “For those who don’t make time for exercise, they’ll have to make time for illness.” Exercise also can include mental activities such as reading, learning to play an instrument and pursuing new hobbies. 

For instance, the World Health Organization (WHO) published an article on February 26, 2018, stating that lack of physical activity significantly contributes to health issues such as stroke, diabetes, and cancer. The American Council on Exercise also indicates that lack of physical activity costs the US $117 billion annually. As taxpayers, we can help reduce these expenses by making the effort to be more physically active. 

Finally, individuals must strive to live a balanced lifestyle. Choosing a balanced lifestyle is a crucial decision driven by self-love. Embracing a balanced lifestyle entails adopting a healthy way of living. This includes selecting a work environment that promotes well-being, whether by finding fulfillment in what you do or appreciating the income that provides you with a roof over your head, the ability to pay your bills and loans, access to health insurance, and the means to care for yourself and your family. Additionally, individuals should find a time to enjoy life, recognizing that it’s not solely about work. However, enjoying life does not mean indulging in illegal drugs that would eventually harm your health. 

Moreover, individuals should learn to say “no” and avoid toxic environments. They should avoid entanglement in friendships with toxic individuals, abusive relationships, or people who take pleasure in seeing you fail to achieve your dreams. Lastly, individuals should strive to live a meaningful life based in honesty, courage and respect. As Andre De Shields advises, “Surround yourself with people whose eyes light up when they see you coming. Slowly is the fastest way to get to where you want to be. The top of one mountain is the bottom of the next, so keep climbing.” I firmly believe that making these life choices can significantly contribute to an individual’s overall physical, mental and emotional well-being.

My purpose of advocating for healthy individuals is that they contribute to building a healthy society. A healthy society is one that is vibrant  and prepared to confront social injustices, including the issue of limited access to healthcare. On the other hand, unhealthy societies may lack the drive to fight for their rights and remain in a perpetual state of "Sauvé qui peut." (every man for himself). Therefore, let each of us fulfill our responsibilities to lead a healthy life and promote the well-being of our society.

For that reason, healthy individuals should not only rely on rhetoric but also act to shape their views of society. As for me, my first action in support of the healthcare system started in 2009. On a Monday, August 31, 2009. I attended a town hall with a group of friends at Niles West High School Auditorium in Skokie, Illinois. United States House of Representative Congresswoman Janice Schakowsky, the 9th District representative, spoke in support of the Affordable Care Act (Obama Care) initiative law. She then asked for feedback from the audience. Some audience members shared personal stories about living without health insurance. Others asked questions about how the Affordable Care Act would affect their health insurance.

Meanwhile, a minority of the audience was adamant that the government should not get involved in their medical privacy. As the meeting continued, tensions rose, and some in the crowd resorted to insults. Congresswoman Janice reiterated her support for the Affordable Care Act, stating that those who disagreed with her could choose not to vote for her. She then left the meeting. Outside, there were anti-Obamacare activists carrying placards with President Obama depicted as a Joker or Hitler, and shouting slogans such as "No Socialized Medicine in my country" or " You’ll have to kill me first to take my grandpa's health insurance.” After the meeting, my friends and I went to a restaurant to share our views and understandings of the healthcare debate. Looking at their faces, I could see they were alive and passionate about the issue.

Furthermore, I purchased a documentary called "Sick Around America." and organized an event where I invited friends to watch it on Friday, September 18, 2009, at 7:30 pm. After the screening, we engaged in a discussion about the need for healthcare reform in America. Although only a few people showed up, the debate was interesting in many ways. I was not discouraged and continued to fight for what I believed in. 

Moreover, I attended events that supported artists advocating for healthcare. On September 10, 2017, at 3 pm, I went to see a play called Mercy Killers at the Greenhouse theater. Michael Milligan, playwright/actor, shared health insurance stories around the country. Through this performance, I not only educated myself but I also supported his artistic initiative. Additionally, I met other activists and members of The Single-Payer Healthcare Group, attending to their meetings and learning about their approach to healthcare.  

Finally, I have consistently dedicated my time and effort to advocating for a healthcare system through writing, organizing and participating in fundraising events to support organizations like Doctors Without Borders. I have also attended rallies and protests to raise awareness and demand a better health system. Moreover, I have exercised my right to vote for politicians who prioritize healthcare reform, and share the same values as I do.

Therefore, I believe that individual actions are crucial in finding a solution to the healthcare crisis in this country. Each person has a duty to contribute to the solution, and together, we can build a stronger and healthier society where everyone has access to essential healthcare services.

At the Community level

Family and community can play a crucial role in addressing the healthcare crises in America. In the West Africa countries of  Senegal and Guinea, families are regarded as the cornerstone of the community. Consequently, it is incumbent upon each family to ensure the well-being of its ailing members. When a family member falls ill, others within the family set aside their differences and come together to assist the sick individual in their recovery or provide support until their final moments. 

In this tradition, each family member provides three crucial forms of assistance for the health of the sick person. Firstly, they visit and bring food and fruits, as it is believed that food serves as the initial medicine for the body. Secondly, they volunteer their time by running errands and helping with various tasks. Lastly, each member donates money according to their means to assist the sick person and their family in covering prescription drug expenses and other needs. 

These practices have been passed down by our ancestors for centuries, serving as a customary way of life that encourages future generations to follow suit. They recognized that a sick body and a troubled mind cannot recover swiftly. Hence, they embraced a natural family healthcare plan that encompasses nutritional, financial, and time-based support. Although reciprocating this assistance is not obligatory for each family member, communities often adhere to these principles of support.

Furthermore, distant family members, neighbors, coworkers, and friends of a sick person also offer support by visiting, providing food, and contributing funds to cover prescription drug expenses and other needs. Despite the prevalent portrayal and illness in Africa through television screens and constant donation appeals, there exists a significant amount of communal support underlying these depictions, which I refer to as the African healthcare support plan.

The IRS could bring considerable justice to many African immigrants residing in the United States of America who financially support their sick parents and family back in Africa. These individuals currently lack the means to claim such expenses as medical expenses.

Despite the erosion of these values in African big cities, I am hopeful that African families will persevere in following their ancestors’ footsteps, despite external influences advocating for the privatization of the healthcare system in their countries. Likewise, I hope that American families and communities will strive to emulate these African values.

I have witnessed similar supportive actions in the Chicago area, such as fundraising efforts to assist a friend against cancer or initiatives on platforms like GoFundMe. These experiences instill hope in me that families and communities coming together can provide a solution to impede the exorbitant costs of healthcare in this country. While no one desires to be sick, the support of family and community can aid in the recovery process or enable a person to have a dignified death. However, it should not be mandatory for someone who does not share the same values.

At the State Level

Each state in this country could contribute to solving the healthcare problems by adopting a healthcare system, constructing public hospitals, or providing funding to individuals or organizations that offer low-cost healthcare services. 

In the 1990s in Senegal, individuals had various options for receiving medical care based on their profession, financial means, and geographic location. Elementary or high school students who fell ill could visit the school infirmaries within their school district, where they would receive free consultations and medications. Similar measures were also available for university students, who could access university hospitals at no cost. 

As state employees, you receive benefits from the state, which allow you and your families to go to public or private hospitals with a minimal cost and discount on drug prescriptions at privately-owned pharmacies. 

Members of the military and their families received free service in military hospitals. For workers in the private sector or those who were self-employed, private and public hospitals were available. 

An unemployed person could seek medical care at public hospitals. person also could go to a religious hospital run by catholic nuns. For instance, a family member, usually a young volunteer, would wake up early in the morning and line up on behalf of the sick person. When the religious hospital opened its doors, the sick person could receive a free consultation and medications.

Farmers in rural areas had the option to consult traditional healers and use traditional herbal remedies, which had both advantages and disadvantages. Alternatively, if the village was not financially or politically well-connected, they could go to the nearest health posts for medical assistance.

For the wealthiest Senegalese, they had the choice to either visit expensive private hospitals or travel to France or other developed countries for medical treatment. 

As a solution to Illinois’s healthcare crisis, I believe the state could learn from the Senegalese healthcare system. I chose Senegal partly because of its commitment to the right to health, aiming for universal health coverage. Senegal has a healthcare and insurance system that grants individuals the freedom to choose based on their financial capacity. While Senegal's healthcare is not flawless, it showcases a successful coexistence between public and private health sectors.

Therefore, Illinois could allocate taxpayer funds to construct or support state hospitals in each of its 102 counties. Additionally, religious institutions could utilize their tax breaks from state and federal governments to emulate the catholic nuns' hospitals in Dakar and provide free healthcare services to those who cannot afford them. This approach would be a pragmatic way to apply the teachings of Jesus Christ, Mohamed, and Moses.

Moreover, unions could utilize members' dues to establish hospitals for their members and hire doctors instead of raising their salaries to compete with CEOs, a lifestyle that lacks sustainability and lacks the consent and support of the members.

Despite the presence of John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County and Heartland Health Centers in the Chicago area, where people can receive free or low-cost healthcare, I believe that every state in the country can strive for improvement by adopting the Senegalese healthcare system, keeping both public and private hospitals operational, and allowing Americans to seek care based on their financial means. 

In Federal Level

In my opinion, the federal government should strive to create a level playing field where competition can thrive, allowing insurance and healthcare systems to coexist. This approach empowers Americans to choose the system that best fits their budget and requirements. To achieve this goal, lawmakers must pass necessary legislation and allocate funds to establish a comprehensive healthcare system alongside the insurance system, safeguarding individuals' right to health. Nevertheless, it is improbable that members of congress will overlook political realities and embrace idealistic activism, particularly when many of them receive campaign funding from insurance and pharmaceutical companies.

Ultimately, the only way to hold politicians accountable is for the American people to vote based on their stance on the universal healthcare system. This will ensure that our elected representatives act to improve healthcare access and affordability for all.

We must also recognize that simply passing laws to allow the coexistence of healthcare and insurance systems is not enough. For these regulations to work, the federal government must provide funding to states that take steps to adopt a healthcare system. I believe that providing financial incentives to states and individual practitioners will help  achieve universal healthcare coverage. However, creating more unfunded federal agencies, which are often ineffective, will not be the solution. 

Instead of creating additional agencies, the federal government should allocate funds to the states for the construction of public hospitals, proportionate to the number of counties and population they have. Additional, the federal government should provide funding to non-profit organizations, communities and private individuals interested in establishing hospitals, hiring doctors and offering competitive, affordable healthcare solutions. Embracing this competitive approach will foster innovation and empower individuals to select from diverse range healthcare options that align with their specific needs.

I believe that by implementing laws that encourage the establishment of well-funded healthcare initiatives, the federal government can foster innovation, encourage competition, and  protect the individual’s right to choose between an insurance and healthcare system, which is a core American value. 

Conclusion

I firmly believe that solutions exist for every human problem. These solutions demand hard work, faith in our capabilities, and the virtue of patience. They also necessitate sincere actions and a drive to innovate. Though the night may be long, the day will come. 

If I lost my job and health insurance in 2013, today I am a full-time employee with comprehensive health insurance benefits. However, my  commitment to advocating for the right to health remains unwavering. My writing is driven not by personal fear or loss, but by a pursuit for justice, love, and the well-being of the human family.

From my perspective, every individual in this country, regardless of their background, race, religion, or employment status, should have the opportunity to receive hospital treatment when sick. They should be able to return home and reunite with their families without the added stress of financial difficulties or the fear of bankruptcy. This vision can be achieved through the solutions I propose: by opening the health sector to competition, where all public and private actors are called upon to provide a solution that guarantees universal healthcare coverage.

However, we must acknowledge that the solutions I offer are based on the context of my time and era. Life is constantly changing, and each generation will have the opportunity to develop its own solutions.

Some may question who I am to come to America and demand healthcare rights. To those individuals, I would like to clarify that I am taxpayer who fulfills my duty each year by paying taxes to the state of Illinois and to the Federal government of United States. Consequently, I exercise my citizenship and the freedom of expression that my contributions guarantee. I demand that both states and federal government to prioritize health. My objective is to establish a system that provides a diverse range of insurance and healthcare options, allowing Americans to choose the system that best suits their needs and financial means.

Yet, we must accept that when it comes to healthcare in America, there is the said and the unsaid, a silence behind the curtain that nobody wants to address, and which translates into these words: as long we live in a society where some derive joy from the misfortunes of others, I am afraid the right to health will remain a distant reality in this country. It feels as though a sword of Damocles hangs over our heads.

 

Best regards, 

Alpha 



Wednesday, May 31, 2023

UTHRT: THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN AMERICA PART II.

PART II: THE STATE OF HEALTHCARE AROUND THE WORLD.

When it comes to healthcare, humans have come a long way. Our ancestors left the Rift Valley caves of Africa, they migrated worldwide to build civilizations and cities such as Cairo, Damascus, Athens, Varanasi, the Sacred City of Caral- Supe, and Timbuktu. In their constant battle with death, they tended to their health to increase their chances of living longer. 

During pandemics,  people first turned to prayer and ritual sacrifices. They sought help from the sea, sun, moon, animals, mountains, and trees. However, they soon realized that these methods alone could not prevent sickness and death. As a result, some brave individuals ventured into the forests in search of herbal remedies. Through trial and error, and often at great personal risk, our ancestors learned the secrets of the healing properties of plants, which they then used to benefit their communities.

The reactions of communities to the efforts of healers varied depending on who controlled the political, economic, and social narrative at the time. The healers’ newfound knowledge was adopted based on the reality of their society.

Unfortunately, some were accused of being witches and suffered condemnation and punishment through burning, guillotining, or hanging in public squares. For example, Ursula Kemp, a healer and midwife in England, was accused of witchcraft in 1582 and was torture and executed. Bridget Bishop became the first woman to be executed for witchcraft during the Salem witch trials in Massachusetts in 1692. Additionally, Giordano Bruno, an Italian philosopher, astronomer, and mathematician, was accused of heresy and witchcraft in the late 16th century and was burned at the stake in 1600. 

On the other hand, certain healers, such as Saint Damien of Molokai, a missionary who dedicated himself to caring for lepers and is recognized as the patron saint of people with leprosy, and Saint Giuseppe Moscati, a physician who provided treatment to the impoverished and sick in Naples, Italy, were esteemed and revered for their remarkable achievements. Additionally, Saint Margaret of Antioch, renowned as the patron saint of childbirth, pregnant women, and infertility, is honored and respected for her invaluable contributions.

Throughout history, there have been contrasting societal responses to healers. However, the presence of traditional healing practices and their cultural heritage is still discernible in various indigenous communities worldwide, where traditional healers continue to be held in high regard.

The era of philosophy, enlightenment, scientific advancements, and industrial revolutions witnessed the emergence of remarkable scientists including the Greek physician Hippocrates of kos, Agnodice, Galileo Galilei, Elizabeth Blackwell, Louis Pasteur, and numerous others. These visionary individuals devoted extensive hours to their research in libraries and laboratories, meticulously studying diseases and pioneering the development of vaccines and remedies to combat them. 

Today, due to the collective efforts of traditional healers and modern scientists, women in numerous regions across the globe can now give birth without fear of risking their lives. Additionally, children have a greater chance of surpassing their first birthday, and parents can enjoy the experience of being grandparents. Despite the emergence of new diseases such as AIDS, Ebola, and Covid-19, it is crucial to recognize the profound impact that medical advancements and improved accessibility have had on human well-being. Consequently, many countries worldwide are dedicated to establishing robust healthcare systems and enacting laws that guarantee their citizens the right to quality healthcare.

The right to health was first mentioned in the 1946 Constitution of the World Health Organization ("WHO"). It states, "the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being." The WHO constitution’s preamble further defines Health as "a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity." Since then, Organizations and Countries have enacted treaties and laws at the international and national levels, as well as adopting policies that align with the common belief that medical progress should benefit and be accessible to the global population.

In addition to the WHO Constitution, the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, for example, states in Article 25, Section 1 that "everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and his family, including food, clothing, housing, and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in the circumstances beyond his control."

Furthermore, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, adopted on December 16, 1966, recognizes in its Article 12, Section 1 "the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health."

As such, the prevailing understanding is that the right to health encompasses both freedoms and entitlements. Countries and Organizations are expected to provide healthcare to their constituents without discrimination based on factors such as race, gender, and background.

Guided by their humanitarian principles, countries established the World Health Organization ("WHO"), with the United States emerging as one of its  primary contributors, providing a substantial funding of $693 million for the period 2020- 2021. Similarly, dedicated individuals founded non-profit organizations like Doctor Without Borders ("DWB"). These organizations persist today, striving to make a positive impact on the health and well-being of people worldwide, despite their inherent limitations. 

For example, on Saturday, October 8, 2022, the WHO Africa Tweeted account shared a significant achievement, stating, "Due to vaccines provided, 20 million people are walking today who would have been paralyzed by polio if not for efforts to deliver vaccines to children around the world". On the other hand, DWB extends medical assistance over 70 countries, offering crucial humanitarian aid to those in dire need. 

Nevertheless, it is essential to acknowledge the well-documented inefficiency of the World Health Organization (WHO). The organization often faces criticism for individuals within its ranks who prioritize self-promotion, flaunting their jobs titles as “ World Savers,” and engaging in receptions while entangling themselves with politicians solely purpose to secure additional grant funding and maintain their preferred lifestyle. However, when it comes to fulfilling their actual job responsibilities, they are nowhere to be seen, hindered by bureaucratic sluggishness, incompetence in addressing real issues, or displaying deep-seated prejudice in their approach serving specific regions of the world. Consequently, numerous experts have criticized the WHO for its delayed response, which significantly contributed to the initial spread of the Ebola virus in 2014

On March 9, 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that a total of 28,616 people died from Ebola around the world, with 11,310 deaths reported in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone during the 2014-2016 outbreak. 

In the case of COVID-19, there have been allegations that World Health Organization (WHO) secretly covered up the severity of the situation, solely to protect certain countries and prioritize their financial interests.

As of September 2021, according to data from the World Health Organization, the total number of deaths worldwide due to COVID-19 exceeded 4.6 million. These staggering death tolls should prompt us to reflect on efficient functioning of such organizations and demand accountability for the great good of humanity.  

On the other hand, non-profit organizations are often compared to doctors who provide remedies without properly diagnosing their patients. They may justify their actions by claiming to possess resources that their clients lack, leading to power dynamic that can result in precarious and temporary outcomes. However, it is important to consider that their reputation and credibility rely on their work, and therefore they must continue to exist.

Nonetheless, non-profit organizations should strive to address the root causes of issues rather than merely providing short-term solutions. By conducting thorough assessments and understanding the underlying problems, they can offer more effective and sustainable assistance to those in need. This approach ensures that their efforts have a lasting impact and contribute to long-term solutions.

In order to address the pressing need for improved healthcare, many countries have enacted legislation to guarantee their citizens the right to access healthcare services. A notable example is the Republic of South Africa, whose constitution (1996), Chapter II, Section 27 on Health care, Food, and Water and Social Security explicitly affirms this right. According to the constitution, “everyone has the right to have access to healthcare services, including reproductive health care.” Moreover, it emphasizes that the government is obliged to take reasonable legislative and other measures, considering the available resources, to “the State must take reasonable legislative and other measures, considering the available resources, to progressively realize these rights.

Furthermore,  the constitution explicitly states that “No one may be refused emergency medical treatment”. This provision underscores the importance of ensuring that emergency healthcare is accessible to all individuals, regardless of their circumstances.

Similarly, Also, the Constitution of India (1950) Part IV, Article. 47, outlines the “duty of the State to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living and to improve public health.” In Ecuador, its 1998 Constitution, Chapter IV: Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Article. 42 guarantees “the right to health, its promotion, and protection, through the development of food security, the provision of drinking water and basic sanitation, the promotion of a healthy family, work and community environment and the possibility of permanent and uninterrupted access to health services.” 

Despite the fact that many scholars acknowledge the impact of country treaties and laws, and organizations on healthcare around the world, there are still some who oppose the belief that healthcare is a human right. One of these individuals is Mr. Philip Barlow, an American Consultant Neurosurgeon. In his July 19, 1999 publication in the National Library of Medicine, he stated that “health care is not a human right.” and offered three reasons for his belief. 

Firstly, he argued that healthcare is difficult to define. Secondly, he emphasized that if healthcare were considered a right, it would imply a duty on the part of others. Finally, in the third reason, he stated that “the philosophical basis of all human rights has always been shaky.” 

Richard D Lamm, former Governor of Colorado, also disagreed with the idea of making healthcare a right, as he believed it would require the government to allocate a significant portion of its resources to providing healthcare to citizens. Additionally, Mr. Imre J P Loefler, former editor of the Nairobi Hospital Proceedings and Frequent Contributor to the British Medical Journal, did not find the concept of a right to health feasible. Instead, he encouraged countries to improve population health through a socio-economic policy rather than relying on a legal right to health.

I respect and acknowledge the concerns of these scholars who oppose the idea of healthcare as a human right. However, I believe that the lack of an agreeable definition of healthcare, excessive governmental expenses, or the need for socio-economic policies should not hinder the effort to provide an optional choice on healthcare to every individual.

Countries such as South Africa, India, and the Equator have enshrined the right to health in their Constitutions, but they may not have all resources needed to achieve a perfect healthcare system. Nonetheless, they are taking steps towards improving access to healthcare, recognizing that there is no such thing as an ideal healthcare system.

In my opinion, all healthcare solutions are time-bound and subject to change as life evolves. Therefore, our only option is to adapt to new changes. For instance, when it comes to reliability and speed, we cannot compare the first car that Henry Ford  designed in 1896 to the latest 2023 Ford car models. Despite early Ford’s cars flaws, we appreciate Mr. Ford for inventing the automobile for the betterment of society. It does not make sense to come up with excuses for not adopting a healthcare system because it might not perfectly work. Instead, each generation should strive to provide a solution, and the next generation can improve upon it.

 Therefore, I commend all countries that have enacted laws guaranteeing their citizens the right to choose between healthcare systems and insurance systems. In my view, the right approach to healthcare on a global scale is to encourage cooperation rather than competition while respecting individual rights.

Best Regards

Alpha

UTHRT; THE RIGHT TO HEALTH IN AMERICA PART III AND FINAL COMING SOON!